Lawrence Law Firm, P.C.

Fearless advocacy in the pursuit of justice.
CALL US LEARN MORE

Welcome To The Lawrence Law Firm


Tara Lawrence is a victims rights advocate specializing in Family law, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Sexual Abuse, Serious Accidents and Elder Abuse. She has served as an elected District Attorney, a statewide executive director of a victims’ rights advocacy group, and has worked as a litigator at some of Portland’s top law firms. Crime victims have rights and remedies that are not always best served in the criminal justice system, but can be helped through the civil system where they are individually represented by a private attorney. As a prosecutor who has tried cases ranging from aggravated murder to sex abuse to burglary. Tara is well equipped to stand up for her clients' rights and be a voice for them in the courtroom.

Over 20 years

Experience helping clients worldwide

$3.5 million

Recovered in a human trafficking case

One of The Youngest DA Elected

In Sherman County Oregon

Media


By Sarah Zimmerman 13 Jun, 2019
SALEM, Ore. (AP) — Oregon’s troubled foster care system still needs to undergo “extensive work” if it wants to adequately address child safety issues, according to a new report released Wednesday from the secretary of state’s Office. But a lack of funding could stand in the way of any major progress, and the report notes the state’s Department of Human Services will need an expensive overall requiring hundreds of new staff members plus years of dedicated investments from legislators and community members. “There is nothing more important than the wellbeing of children,” Secretary of State Bev Clarno said in a statement. “DHS is moving in the right direction, but there is still work that needs to be done to ensure proper staffing, suitable foster homes and residential facilities, and a better overall culture.” The report itself is a follow-up to a 2018 state audit that found systemic issues in the way the DHS manages the approximately 7,500 foster children in its care. Child welfare workers, overburdened with high caseloads, had little to no time to meet in person with the children in their care. Out of a lack of quality foster care homes, the department has been forced to keep children in hotels, refurbished juvenile jails or in out-of-state, for-profit facilities where child welfare advocates say kids were neglected and left vulnerable to further abuses. The agency has weathered years criticism and has recently been slapped with a federal lawsuit alleging that DHS has failed to shield children from abuse. The secretary of state’s office notes that DHS has taken some positive steps, working to improve workplace culture and expand training opportunities for caseworkers. But the report notes that problems still remain. Progress going forward could be more difficult, as the office cautions that “uncertain funding for improvements could undermine those efforts.” The report stresses that reducing caseworker turnover and workload is likely the “most important” step in addressing the flaws within the foster care system, but it’s also the most expensive. The Secretary of State’s office estimates that the department would need an additional 570 caseworkers and 800 support workers to meet its staffing needs, far more than even DHS’ original estimates. That, the office admits, would require “extensive funding.” It’s a tough ask, especially as legislative budget leaders are looking to make 5% cuts across nearly all state agencies. Gov. Kate Brown recommended spending $762 million on foster care in her proposed budget late last year, which is $56 million more than what the agency needs to maintain existing services. But her budget, which prioritizes recruiting foster parents and expanding placements for high-needs youth, notably doesn’t include the agency’s requests for an additional $77 million to expand staffing levels. Legislators are finalizing agency budgets and must decide how to allocate the historic amount of revenue flowing into the state before the end of June. But despite the unexpected increase in cash flow, budget leaders have cautioned prudence and previously suggested investing the money into the state’s rainy-day fund. Brown wants to use $50 million of the surplus revenue to pay for additional caseworkers among other improvements, saying it’s the first step to “lower caseloads, and improve staff culture and child safety.” “To move forward and make meaningful change, the agency needs more resources and expertise,” she said in a statement. “I have deployed an oversight board and crisis management team, but the Legislature needs to do their part and provide the funding needed for the state to better serve children.” Read original article here .
By Guest Columnist 10 Jan, 2019
Sex offenders steal the innocence of our children. As a private practice attorney, it is an honor advocating for clients who are survivors of sex abuse. While previously serving as a district attorney, I witnessed the invaluable role that our judges play in holding child molesters accountable for their crimes. Oregonians are fortunate to have Measure 11, which provides mandatory minimum sentences for the most violent felons and sex offenders. Victims in Montana and Alabama do not have the benefit of Measure 11. The result is senseless sentences for sex offenders. In Montana, Judge Todd Baugh recently sentenced a convicted sex offender (and schoolteacher) to 30 days in jail and commented that the 14-year-old rape victim appeared “older than her chronological age” and “…was probably as much in control of the situation as was the defendant.” The victim took her life before she could be re-victimized by the judge. Is this an isolated misstep by a judge charged with the responsibility of holding a sexual predator accountable for his crimes? I wish it was. In Alabama, Judge James Woodroof recently refused to sentence a convicted sex offender for three rape charges. The judge’s initial sentencing order was successfully appealed by the prosecutor only to have him willfully order for the second time an inappropriately lenient punishment. You might ask yourself why these judges are handing down such offensive sentences. The method to their madness is based on a concept known as restorative justice. Restorative justice sounds warm and fuzzy, but let me assure you it is not. Restorative justice sounds good on paper and attempts to conceal the sentencing philosophy that victims and criminals are essentially morally equal. This concept plays a reasonable role in minor property offenses, particularly involving juveniles, but should be viewed with extreme caution when the crimes are sexual assault or murder. A few victims want to face the predator who hurt them, but usually in the safety of a courtroom. The goal of this philosophy is reconciliation between victim and offender, not accountability through an appropriate prison sentence. The power of forgiveness belongs to the victim, not the sentencing judge. Survivors of child sex abuse should be empowered to decide if and when they grant the offender forgiveness. Oregon’s constitution provides that the criminal justice system is based on four principles: 1) protection of society; 2) personal accountability; 3) accountability for one’s actions; and 4) reformation. Restorative justice is not appropriate in Oregon, but Measure 11 is. Laws provide definitions of crime. A victim makes it personal. According to statistics, child abuse damages 1 out of 4 girls and 1 out of 6 boys across America. As a community we are charged with the responsibility of protecting our children from sexual predators. We cannot accept the unacceptable sentences for child molesters highlighted in the national news. After starting my career as a prosecutor I have learned that not all justice is achieved in the criminal courts. That is why individuals and institutions need to be held accountable in ways that are meaningful. It seems fitting that our federal courthouse located downtown features one of my favorite quotes from Martin Luther King Jr.: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Tara Lawrence, former Sherman County district attorney, practices law in Portland, where she specializes in representing victims. Read original post here .
More Posts
Share by: